Hektoen International

A Journal of Medical Humanities

Musical evenings on HMS Bounty

Stewart Justman
Missoula, Montana, United States


Captain William Bligh, after his efforts against scurvy, is turned from the HMS Bounty in the course of a munity.
The mutineers turning Bligh and his crew from the Bounty, 29th April 1789. Illustration by Robert Dodd. 1790. National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.

Dispatched to Tahiti in 1787 to gather breadfruit trees to be transplanted to the West Indies, HMS Bounty was a small ship with every possible inch allotted to botanical cargo. Spare too was the crew, which included no marines who might have acted as Lieutenant William Bligh’s bodyguards in the events to come. The crew did, however, include an Irish fiddler. In the tradition of the bard of King Alcinous’ court in The Odyssey, Michael Byrn was blind (or nearly so), which may explain why, amid the turmoil of the mutiny, he remained on the Bounty rather than scrambling into the launch that would carry Bligh and his party across the Pacific to safety in the Dutch East Indies. A lesser figure in the background of events, Byrn was tried for mutiny, maintained that he wished and intended to join Bligh when he (Bligh) was cast into the sea, and was acquitted. What was a fiddler doing on the Bounty in the first place?

The mutiny occurred just weeks before the storming of the Bastille and lives in the world’s imagination as an uprising against tyranny in its own right. Despite his reputation as a despot, however, Bligh valued high morale, and it seems he brought Byrn onto his ship with that in mind. Byrn’s fiddle would cheer the Bounty. And because the cheerful mind breathes health into the body, the fiddle would also help preserve the Bounty from disease—an urgent concern for any sea commander but perhaps especially for Bligh, who had served under a captain legendary for sailing to remote regions and back without losing a soul to scurvy: James Cook. If only because scurvy was at once deadly and yet (as Cook showed) preventable, Bligh felt that an outbreak at sea reflected disgrace on a ship and its commander. But prevention did not come easily. Keeping the Bounty scurvy-free meant instating not just a proper diet (even if its composition was still in question), but strict hygiene. The ship must be scrubbed down with vinegar, the men must keep themselves and their clothing clean, and—most significantly for our purposes—a good frame of mind must prevail. Reporting to his patron Joseph Banks, President of the Royal Society, on the mental hygiene of all those under him, Bligh wrote, “Both men & officers tractable and well disposed & cheerfulness and content in the countenance of every one. I am sure nothing is even more conducive to health.”1

Documenting Bligh’s preoccupation with hygiene, a recent investigator discusses compulsory dancing along with a diet evidently modeled on Cook’s.2 It was for the dance sessions that the fiddle was needed. Wrote Bligh in his log, “Some time for relaxation and mirth is absolutely necessary, and I have considered it so much so that after 4 o’clock, the evening is laid aside for their amusement and dancing. I had great difficulty before I left England to get a man to play the violin and I preferred at last to take one two-thirds blind than come without one.”3 Not that the men of the Bounty were free to enjoy themselves. Another private comment reveals the prescriptive nature of the Bounty’s evenings of mirth. “I have always directed the evenings from 5 to 8 o’clock to be spent in dancing, & that every man should be obliged to dance as I considered it conducive to their health.”4

In the light of events, one wonders how compliant the crew really was and how well the program of mandatory merriment went down with them. When the gunner’s mate and the assistant gardener, both of whom would join the mutiny, refused on one occasion to dance, Bligh “ordered their grog to be stopped with a promise of further punishment on a second refusal.”5 Others must have swallowed their resentment and performed their jigs. Ironically, the fiddler, aboard for the sole purpose of cheering one and all, seems to have been loved by none, while Bligh was tone-deaf to the irony of his musical edicts. The same failure of perception is at work in his scarcely credible portrait of the Bounty on the eve of the mutiny as “a ship in the most perfect order,” conveying a thousand plants likewise “in the most flourishing state,”6 as if the saplings were a living emblem of the vessel itself.

While Bligh misread the Bounty, his estimate of the importance of morale proved only too just in the end. During his party’s flight across the sea in an open boat following their severance from the Bounty, with his fellow refugees driven to the limits of their endurance if not beyond, “if any one of them had despaired, he would most probably have died before we reached New Holland [Australia]”: so Bligh reported in his narrative of the mutiny and its aftermath.7 In the event, through Bligh’s management of provisions, nursing of the sick, enforcement of discipline, and refusal to submit to demoralization, the boat reached Timor—a distance of some 3900 miles—without loss of life.

Even in ordinary nautical circumstances, however, Bligh believed morale could mean the difference between life and death. The curse of ships at sea was scurvy, its toll so dire that George Anson (later First Lord of the Admiralty) in the account of his voyage around the world in the 1740s tells of vessels that lost hundreds of men. Perhaps confusing the despair of the afflicted with a cause of the disease, a school of opinion that included Anson, held dejection itself to be a predisposing cause of scurvy. If the descent into scurvy begins with a loss of morale, then the commander who keeps his men in a state of good morale, at once disciplined and cheerful, might be said to hold the disease at bay. Bligh sought to do just that, imposing a regimen of gaiety in the hope of averting a plague all too familiar to every naval commander. As he wrote to his uncle from the Bounty, “Cheerfulness with exercise, and a sufficiency of rest are powerful preventatives to this dreadful disease [scurvy], a calamity which even at this present period destroys more men than is generally known. To assist in the first two particulars every opportunity I directed that the evenings should be spent in dancing.”8

Though Bligh’s insistence on hygiene, physical and moral, is easily caricatured as a neurotic obsession, the regimen he enforced was consistent with medical opinion at the time. Not even the best authorities on scurvy, including the man who wrote the book on it, James Lind, believed it could be reliably prevented or cured by diet alone. Though it was common nautical knowledge that fruits like oranges and lemons fend off scurvy—hence Lind’s use of them in the 1747 experiment aboard HMS Salisbury now celebrated as the first controlled clinical trial—Lind never attributed scurvy to any single factor. Not only deficient diet but moist, cold air and damp quarters, among other influences, tend to produce the disease. Consistent with this environmental perspective is Lind’s considered judgment, expressed at the end of the third and last edition of his weighty Treatise on the Scurvy (1772), that scurvy is bred by confinement. Dwelling below decks means being trapped in bad air, stifled, unable to expel digestive wastes through the skin. Dejection or melancholy, for its part, might be likened to stifling in the bad air of one’s own thoughts.

Those who imagine that Lind’s Treatise concerns oranges and lemons will be surprised to discover that his now-famous trial went nowhere and that at many points he implicates mood and frame of mind in scurvy. Thus, in a discussion of the causes of the disease he observes, “The passions of the mind are found to have a great effect. Those that are of a cheerful and contented disposition, are less liable to it [that is, scurvy], than others of a discontented and melancholy turn of mind.” (In this context, Bligh’s private comments on the docility and good disposition of the Bounty’s crew—observations that seem hopelessly inapt in the light of the mutiny—read like the notes of one watchful for warning signs of disease and relieved by their seeming absence.) While a dietary deficiency may be the immediate (in Lind’s terms, the “occasional”) cause of scurvy, bad diet alone might not be enough to produce scurvy in a constitution untouched by such predisposing causes as confinement, inactivity, and despair, just as a debilitated constitution can lead to scurvy even in the presence of good diet. According to Lind, scurvy is an inexplicable disease with no single cause or treatment, and all contributing causes, including the darker “passions of the mind,” have the effect of weakening digestion and obstructing perspiration, which are scurvy’s mechanisms.9 It appears Bligh had an edition of Lind’s Treatise with him on the Bounty.10

For the prevention of scurvy, Lind advises removal into dry surroundings, fresh fruits and vegetables, and “contentment of mind, procured by agreeable and entertaining amusements.”11 Bligh did his utmost to keep the Bounty dry, obtained fresh food when possible, and enacted Lind’s recommendation of amusement in a sort of direct and literal manner. Along with a good diet per se, the crew should be fed a good diet of entertainment.

The notion that a seaman’s state of mind has a bearing on his susceptibility to scurvy was by no means peculiar to Lind. In Anson’s Voyage Round the World, Bligh would have learned that “sanguine thoughts” in and of themselves seem to be “no contemptible preservatives” from the “fatal malignity” of scurvy.12 This idea did not originate with Anson and did not die with Lind, and the same is true of the converse, that poor morale disposes to scurvy. Lind’s disciple Gilbert Blane, who finally persuaded the Admiralty to stock the fleet with lemons, found that men dragged into the Navy by force were highly vulnerable to scurvy precisely because they were so demoralized.

There are always numbers who have been pressed into the service, to whom sea life is new, and who are therefore prone to indolence, low spirits, and self-neglect. Men of this description are by far the most apt to fall into the scurvy; and next to the quality of the food, there is nothing that contributes more to promote the scurvy than such a disposition. It is indeed both a cause and a symptom of this disease.13

Low morale invites scurvy and happiness deters it. “As low spirits and indolence have such an unfavourable effect upon health,” Blane continues, “it would be wise as well as benevolent to promote whatever produces jollity, contentment, and good humour, so far as it is consistent with sobriety and regularity.”14 Bligh considered jolly evenings on the Bounty just such a therapeutic measure.

That even Blane, whose lemons settled the question, considered depression a cause and good spirits a deterrent of scurvy suggests that understanding of the disease was by no means governed by mind-body dualism. And Blane’s estimate of the importance of morale in the causation of scurvy seems to have been shared. Thomas Trotter, eventually appointed Physician to the Channel Fleet, judged that “depressing passions of the mind have a powerful effect in the production of scurvy.”15 Accordingly, he also suggested that

A moderate degree of exercise is certainly necessary, not only for promoting the excretions of perspiration and urine, but perhaps for other purposes equally important to health. The body being employed from its action on the mind, has the effect of preventing that train of ideas that lead to thought and all the sedative passions which operate so powerfully and successfully in the production of this disease.16

Had Bligh read this somewhat obscure passage published a year before the Bounty sailed, he could well have concluded that dancing to the fiddle serves health not only by promoting excretion (a process whose blockage produces scurvy, according to Lind) but by cleansing the mind of “sedative passions.” Because scurvy arises from moral as well as physical causes, it responds not only to lemons but to moral therapies like cleanliness, good discipline, and battle readiness, as well as hygienic amusements like music.

Scurvy was not the only ailment deemed responsive to moral causes and treatments. The contribution of “affections” like fear and grief to many ills is investigated in William Falconer’s Dissertation on the Influence of the Passions upon Disorders of the Body, a remarkable document published in 1788 while the Bounty was at sea. Falconer groups scurvy with maladies like melancholy, mania, and nostalgia, almost as if it had no dietary component to speak of. Like Blane, he appears to consider loss of morale both a cause and a symptom of scurvy, a potentially vicious double role that makes the management of morale at sea all the more urgent. Those who implicated indolence, poor morale, dejection and the like in scurvy could have summed up the syndrome in the traditional term “melancholy,” another malady in which causes and symptoms overlapped. Interestingly, Falconer closes his discussion of melancholy by citing the opinion that music “may perhaps be a powerful remedy.”17 Here, then, is another indicator that despite the paradoxical character of the very notion of administered mirth, the fiddle sessions on the Bounty accorded with enlightened thinking no less than Bligh’s prescription of malt for men on the sick list at risk of scurvy.

To say that some of the best medical thinking of the time underscored the importance of state of mind to scurvy does not mean that such views broke with the past. From the beginning of the seventeenth century if not earlier, scurvy seems to have been associated with a melancholy disposition. Lind cites a report from 1604 noting that scurvy attacks “the discontented, idle, and repining.”18 In his Experimental Essays (1767) David Macbride, whose promotion of malt as a scurvy-preventive helped distract the Admiralty from citrus, prints a passage from John Woodall’s Surgeon’s Mate (1617) listing “cares and grief” among possible causes of the dreaded disease.19 (Interestingly, Woodall also notes that lemon juice is “a precious medicine” against scurvy; “let it have the chief place, for it will well deserve it.”) An extract reprinted by Lind that made a strong impression on Falconer (for he reprints it in turn) tells of soldiers trapped in the besieged city of Breda in 1625 who succumb en masse to scurvy until their spirits are rallied by a sham remedy delivered with a maximum of theater by the Prince of Orange. Says Lind’s source, “Grief and fear greatly injure the human body, and in a particular manner give strength and vigour to the plague of scurvy.”20

At the turn of the nineteenth century, Falconer’s colleague John Haygarth published a historic pamphlet with the striking title Of the Imagination as a Cause and a Cure of Disorders of the Body, reporting trials of “animal electricity” against a sham treatment (as we would now say, a placebo). Concerned as he is with effects of the mind on the body, Haygarth gravitates to the issue of scurvy and, like Falconer, quotes at length from the section of Lind’s Treatise telling of the remarkable effect of rising morale among the scurvy-stricken soldiers of Breda. Lind himself, the presiding medical officer of Haslar Hospital, the largest in Britain, was so far from a reductive dualist that he argued in a passage reprinted by both Haygarth and Falconer that remedies of a disease like scurvy may fail unless reinforced by “the concurring influences of the soul.”21 Bligh was convinced that an antiscorbutic regimen must enlist these potent influences; hence the heavy-handed program of dance therapy on the Bounty.

It is remarkable that Haygarth saw fit to reproduce passages in Lind’s Treatise emphasizing non-somatic causes and cures of scurvy, and all the more remarkable in that Lind’s source material comes from the seventeenth century. By 1800 when Haygarth’s pamphlet appeared, the Admiralty had already been provisioning the British fleet with lemons for five years, thereby closing the question of scurvy’s prevention for all practical purposes—for the time being.22 Morale-boosting amusements lost their antiscorbutic point. On a ship like the Bounty where morale broke down irreparably, such diversions ultimately lost all meaning anyway. If the Bounty was scurvy-free, good cheer was no contributing cause. Nevertheless, Haygarth’s endorsement of Lind’s estimate of the potent “influences of the soul” suggests that life remained in the tradition that even a disease like scurvy, which responds so well to lemons, has moral determinants.



  1. Caroline Alexander, The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty (New York, 2003), 102, 86.
  2. Alexander 84.
  3. Alexander 84.
  4. Alexander 102.
  5. Gavin Kennedy, Captain Bligh: The Man and His Mutinies (London, 1989), 41.
  6. William Bligh and Edward Christian, The Bounty Mutiny (London, 2001), 11.
  7. Bligh and Christian 52.
  8. Kennedy 31.
  9. James Lind, Treatise on the Scurvy, third ed. (London, 1772), 88, 74, 516, 230.
  10. Kennedy 26.
  11. Lind 139.
  12. George Anson, A Voyage Round the World in the Years 1740-1744 (London, 1979), 106.
  13. Gilbert Blane, Observations on the Diseases Incident to Seamen (London, 1785), 322.
  14. Blane 323.
  15. Thomas Trotter, Observations on the Scurvy (Edinburgh, 1786), 37.
  16. Trotter 83.
  17. William Falconer, Dissertation on the Influence of the Passions upon Disorders of the Body (London, 1788), 82.
  18. Lind 299.
  19. David Macbride, Experimental Essays on Medical and Philosophical Subjects, second ed. (London, 1767), 199.
  20. Lind 343-44.
  21. Lind 354n.
  22. David Harvie, Limeys: The Conquest of Scurvy (Thrupp, 2002); Neil MacGillivray, “The Scottish Scurvy Epidemic of 1847,” Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 50 (2020): 444-50.



STEWART JUSTMAN, Prof Emeritus of Liberal Studies at the University of Montana, has written extensively on literature and medicine. His recent publications have appeared in Medical Humanities; Perspectives in Biology and Medicine; and Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.


Winter 2022  |  Sections  |  History Essays

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.